Features of stroke course under adaptive kinesitherapy
https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2023.2.67
Abstract
The modern step in development of restorative medicine for patients with cerebralin farction (CI) is associated with phenotype-oriented medical rehabilitation based on a biomechanical analysis of specific motor impairments that reflect the nature of motor adaptations. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dynamics of adaptive kinematics (ADK)and the clinical picture of CI under the influence of adaptive kinesitherapy (AK). The object of the study were healthy volunteers (n = 92) and a cohort of CI patients treated according to the complex therapy program (groups “P” (n = 50) and “O” (n = 57)) and AK (group “O”) The subject of the study was a comprehensive assessment of the data obtained from clinical testing and biomechanical data in comparison with normal values. As a result of the study, it was found that AK significantly (p < 0.022) improves ADK in patients with various patho biomechanical phenotypes (PBP) of CI. Similarly, AK has a positive effect on the dynamics of the level of daily activity (p < 0.006), mobility level (p < 0.001), gait stereotype function (p < 0.001), and fatigue level (p < 0.001), increasing the overall effectiveness of the complex therapy program (p < 0.003) with an odds ratio of 4.03 (95 % CI 1.44–11.24):5.1 (95 % CI 1.17–22.51) in patients with PBP 1 (p < 0 .02); 8.1 (95 % CI 1.15–55.61)in patients with PBP 2 (p < 0.02), and 7.71 (95 % CI 1.76–33.72) in patients with PBP 3(p < 0.003), with excellent diagnostic quality (AUC = 0.92).
About the Authors
U. A. LukashevichBelarus
V. V. Ponomarev
Belarus
S. V. Gubkin
Belarus
M. I. Tarasevich
Belarus
S. M. Mankevich
Belarus
E. O. Ponomareva
Belarus
V. V. Kovaleva
Belarus
D. A. Korolevich
Belarus
N. P. Drazhina
Belarus
S. A. Aleshkevich
Belarus
References
1. Katan, M., Luft A. Global Burden of Stroke // Semin. Neurol. – 2018. – Vol. 38(2). – P. 208–211.
2. Tashiro, S., Mizuno K., Kawakami M., Takahashi O., Nakamura T., Suda M., Haruyama K., Otaka Y., Tsuji T., Liu M. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation-enhanced rehabilitation is associated with not only motor but also somatosensory cortical plasticity in chronic stroke patients: an interventional study // Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease. – 2019. – Vol. 10. – P. 1–13.
3. Saad, M. B., Vishal S. V. Stroke rehabilitation: A call to action in Saudi Arabia // Neurosciences. – 2016. – Vol. 21(4). – P. 297–305.
4. Mercier, C., Bertrand A. M., Bourbonnais D. Differences in the magnitude and direction of forces during a submaximal matching task in hemiparetic subjects // Exp. Brain Res. – 2004. – Vol. 157(1). – P. 32–42.
5. Dewald, J. P., Beer R. F. Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis // Muscle Nerve. – 2001. – Vol. 24(2). – P. 273–283.
6. Colombo, R., Cusmano I., Sterpi I., Mazzone A., Delconte C., Pisano F. Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery // Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. – 2014. – Vol. 22(5). – P. 1020–1029.
7. Lukashevich, V. A. Adaptivnaya kineziterapiya: teoriya i praktika / V. A. Lukashevich. – Minsk: CHetyre chetverti, 2021. – 236 s. ISBN 978-985-581-434-5.
8. Lukashevich, V. A., Ponomarev V. V., Gubkin S. V., Tarasevich M. I. Ocenka effektivnosti terapii pacientov s infarktom golovnogo mozga po dannym adaptivnoj kinematiki // Novosti mediko-biologicheskih nauk. – 2022. – T. 22, № 3. – S. 175–181.
9. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). – Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. – 342 p.
10. Alejandro, G., Sara L., Joan S., Eloy O., Josep M. T., Montserrat B. Evidence of chronic stroke rehabilitation interventions in activities and participation outcomes: systematic review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials // Eur. J. of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. – 2019. – Vol. 55(6). – P. 695–709.
11. Wolf, M. E., Sauer T., Alonso A., Hennerici M. G. Comparison of the new ASCO classification with the TOAST classification in a population with acute ischemic stroke // J. Neurol. – 2012. – Vol. 259. – P. 1284–1289.
12. Lukashevich, V. A., Morozevich-Shilyuk T. A., Lesiv G. G. Opyt primeneniya mobil'nogo prilozheniya dlya ocenki sostoyaniya oporno-dvigatel'nogo apparata // Mir sporta. – 2021. – № 2(83). – S. 122–128.
13. Lukashevich, V. A., Ponomarev V. V., Tarasevich M. I., Zhivolupov S. A. Funkcional'naya reciproknaya nejromyshechnaya elektrostimulyaciya v adaptivnoj kineziterapii postinsul'tnyh pacientov // Nauka i zdravoohranenie. – 2020. – T. 22, № 3. – S. 80–88.
Review
For citations:
Lukashevich U.A., Ponomarev V.V., Gubkin S.V., Tarasevich M.I., Mankevich S.M., Ponomareva E.O., Kovaleva V.V., Korolevich D.A., Drazhina N.P., Aleshkevich S.A. Features of stroke course under adaptive kinesitherapy. Medical Journal. 2023;(2):67-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2023.2.67