Characteristics of damage to the fibal bone in fractures of the ankle and distal tibile
https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2024.2.125
Abstract
The study purpose was the evaluation of fibula injuries in malleolar fractures and distal tibia fractures (segments 44 and 43 according to AO/OTA fracture classification), to reveal the most typical types of injuries and morphological fracture parameters, which could be important for the development of the intramedullary fixator of the fibula. Radiological data of 57 patients with malleolar fractures and 54 patients with distal tibia fractures were evaluated. In ankle injuries the vast majority of fibula fractures (84.2 %) were presented by transsyndesmotic injuries (type B according to AO/OTA), majority of fibula fractures (89 %) were simple, without signs of comminution, the fracture plane passed at an angle of 33.1о ± 10.7о to the axis of the fibula, the center of fracture was located at the level of 21.6 ± 8.8 mm from ankle articular surface. In distal tibia fractures fibula injuries were more variable: in 20 % of cases there were no fibula fracture at all, 6 % involved the proximal part, 27 % – shaft and 47 % distal part of the fibula. Comminuted fractures were seen in 32 % of cases, the center of the fracture was located from 10 mm distal to the tibia articular surface to 317 mm proximal to it (Ме 35 mm, Q1-Q3: 15–68 mm). The revealed data shows that most important for the development of the intramedullary fibular fixator are ankle injuries, which have more predictable pattern.
About the Authors
A. SitnikBelarus
A. Kochubinski
Belarus
A. Kruk
Belarus
References
1. Belen’kij, I. G., Majorov B. A. Osteosintez nestabil’nyh perelomov lodyzhek i zadnego kraya bol’shebercovoj kosti iz zadnelateral’nogo hirurgicheskogo dostupa / Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. – 2021. – № 3 (27). – P. 29–42.
2. Asloum, Y. [et al.]. Internal fixation of the fibula in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized and comparative study: plating versus nailing / Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research: OTSR. – 2014. – № 4, Suppl. 100. – P. S255–9.
3. Behery, O. A. [et al.]. Posterior Malleolar Fixation Reduces the Incidence of TransSyndesmotic Fixation in Rotational Ankle Fracture Repair // The Iowa orthopaedic journal. – 2021. – № 1 (41). – P. 121–125.
4. Busel, G. A., Watson J. T., Israel H. Evaluation of Fibular Fracture Type vs Location of Tibial Fixation of Pilon Fractures // Foot & ankle international. – 2017. – № 6 (38). – P. 650–655.
5. Court-Brown, C. M., McBirnie J., Wilson G. Adult ankle fractures – an increasing problem? // Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. – 1998. – № 1 (69). – P. 43–47.
6. Elsoe, R., Ostgaard S. E., Larsen P. Populationbased epidemiology of 9767 ankle fractures // Foot and ankle surgery: official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. – 2018. – № 1 (24). – P. 34–39.
7. Kurylo, J. C. [et al.]. Does the Fibula Need to be Fixed in Complex Pilon Fractures? // Journal of orthopaedic trauma. – 2015. – № 9 (29). – P. 424–427.
8. Meinberg, E. G. [et al.]. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium2018 // Journal of orthopaedic trauma. – 2018. – № 32, Suppl. 1. – P. S1–S170.
9. Peeperkorn, S., Nijs S., Hoekstra H. Why Fibular Nailing Can Be an Efficient Treatment Strategy for AO Type 44B Ankle Fractures in the Elderly // The Journal of foot and ankle surgery: official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. – 2018. – № 5 (57). – P. 961–966.
10. Scheer, R. C. [et al.]. Ankle Fracture Epidemiology in the United States: PatientRelated Trends and Mechanisms of Injury // The Journal of foot and ankle surgery: official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. – 2020. – № 3 (59). – P. 479–483.
Review
For citations:
Sitnik A., Kochubinski A., Kruk A. Characteristics of damage to the fibal bone in fractures of the ankle and distal tibile. Medical Journal. 2024;(2):125-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2024.2.125