Induced labor: outcome for mother and fetus
https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2023.4.121
Abstract
According to the WHO data, induced labor accounts for up to 25 % of all labors in the world, which makes this problem relevant in modern obstetrics. There is currently increasing interest in expanding indications and methods for pre- and/or induction. In the course of the study, an analysis of induced labor in the 5th City Clinical Hospital for 2021–2022 was carried out. The most commonly used methods of induction, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the timing and outcomes for the mother and fetus after induction of labor were determined. As a result of the analysis, it became clear that the induction of labor in the Republic of Belarus, as well as throughout the world, is being used more and more often. The main indications for labor induction were more than 287 days of pregnancy, extragenital pathology and pregnancy complications. The ineffectiveness of induction is apparently due to a combination of structural features of the cervix, uterine sensitization to uterotonics, and the state of calcium-magnesium metabolism, which requires further research.
About the Authors
V. N. Sidorenko
УО «Белорусский государственный медицинский университет»
Belarus
Belarus
V. A. Schostak
УЗ «5 городская клиническая больница»
Belarus
Belarus
S. M. Zimin
УО «Белорусский государственный медицинский университет»
Belarus
Belarus
I. S. Kuhta
УЗ «5 городская клиническая больница»
Belarus
Belarus
D. E. Kashitskij
УЗ «5 городская клиническая больница»
Belarus
Belarus
V. A. Rutkovskiy
УЗ «5 городская клиническая больница»
Belarus
Belarus
E. N. Kirillova
УО «Белорусский государственный медицинский университет»
Belarus
Belarus
A. B. Levina
УЗ «5 городская клиническая больница»
Belarus
Belarus
K. O. Kurilovich
УО «Белорусский государственный медицинский университет»
Belarus
Belarus
References
1. Akusherstvo: uchebnoe posobie / Yu. K. Malevich, E. I. Baranovskaya, G. I. Gerasimovich [et al.]; pod red. Yu. K. Malevicha. – Minsk: Belarus', 2017. – 511 s.
2. Baev, O. R. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya // Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. – 2021. – № 3. – S. 40–44.
3. Vasil’ev, S. A. Indukciya rodov: opredelenie veroyatnosti razvitiya akusherskih i perinatal’nyh oslozhnenij: avtoreferat dis. na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kand. med. nauk: 14.01.01 / S. A. Vasil’ev // BGMU. – Minsk, 2022. – 24 s.
4. Gur’ev, D. L., Ohapkin M. B., Gur’eva D. D., Kabanov I. V., Gur’eva M. S., Nidershtrat L. N., Sorokina T. A. // RMZH. Mat’ i ditya. – 2020. – № 1. – S. 9–15.
5. Novikova, O. N., Solomatina O. A. // Mat’ i Ditya v Kuzbasse. – 2018. – № 2. – S. 31–35.
6. Mozurkewich, E. L., Chilimigras J. L., Berman D. R., Perni U. C., Romero V. C., King V. J., Keeton K. L. // BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. – 2011. – № 84. – P. 1–19.
7. Ozbasli, E., Canturk M., Ganime Aygun E., Ozaltin S., Gungor M. // BioMed Research International. – 2022. – Vol. 2022. – P. 1–9.
8. Pfützenreuter, G. R., Cavalieri J. C., Oliveira Fragoso A. P., Da Corregio K. S., Freitas P. F., Junior A. T. // RBGO. – 2019. – Vol. 41, № 6. – P. 363–370.
9. Priyadarshini, A., Jaiswar S., Singh A., Singh S. // Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. – 2019. – Vol. 8, № 1. – P. 55–59.
10. Saccone, G., Corte L. D., Maruotti G. M., Quist-Nelson J., Raffone A., De Vivo V., Esposito G., Zullo F., Berghella V. // AOGS. – 2019. – Vol. 98, № 8. – P. 958–966.
11. WHO recommendations for induction of labour // WHO. – 2014. – 40 p.
12. Malevich, Yu. K., V. A. SHostak «Primenenie prostaglandinov dlya indukcii rodov», metod. Rekomendacii, g. Minsk, 2009 g.
13. Klinicheskij protokol «Medicinskoe nablyudenie i okazanie medicinskoj pomoshchi zhenshchinam v akusherstve i ginekologii». – Minsk, 2018.
Review
For citations:
Sidorenko V.N., Schostak V.A., Zimin S.M., Kuhta I.S., Kashitskij D.E., Rutkovskiy V.A., Kirillova E.N., Levina A.B., Kurilovich K.O. Induced labor: outcome for mother and fetus. Medical Journal. 2023;(4):121-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2023.4.121
Views:
4
Email this article 