Differential approach in the surgical treatment of tube pregnancy
https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2022.4.102
Abstract
Ectopic pregnancy is still actual problem in gynecology nowadays due to its unpredictability and is serious threat for women’s life because in the case of interrupt it’s accompanied massive bleeding. Without contemporary treatment the death is potential. Nowadays there is no common treatment approach for patients with ectopic pregnancy. According to the literature frequency of treatment tactic is dependent of country. The purpose of the work is to assess the validity of the choice of the type of surgery for patients with ectopic pregnancy. The article presents the results of clinical observation of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of tubal pregnancy. The study included 103 case histories of patients whose age corresponded to the reproductive age period, according to WHO criteria (15–49 years) and ranged from 23 to 42 years. Based on the volume of surgical intervention, 5 observation groups were formed. The gynecological anamnesis, complaints of patients when contacting the emergency department, laboratory and instrumental diagnostics performed in dynamics, the choice of treatment tactics (organ-preserving or radical surgery) were analyzed. Based on the data obtained, recommendations for the treatment and follow-up of patients with tubal pregnancy were formed.
About the Authors
V. N. SidorenkoBelarus
E. B. Kartasheva
Belarus
Zh. I. Kovaleva
Belarus
A. V. Gudkov
Belarus
V. Yu. Bugrov
Belarus
A. V. Gordievich
Belarus
References
1. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya № 3 (5), 2014 [Elektronnyj resurs] / gl. red.: G. T. Suhih, G. M. Savel’eva, V. E. Radzinskij. – M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2014.
2. Vnematochnaya (ektopicheskaya) beremennost’. Klinicheskie rekomendacii, RF 2017.
3. Sutugina, O. N., Shubin L. B. Operativnoe lechenie vnematochnoj beremennosti: osobennosti razlichnyh vidov hirurgicheskih // Mediko-farmacevticheskij zhurnal “Pul’s”. – 2020. – Vol. 22, № 10.
4. Fetishcheva, L. E., Mozes V. G., Mozes K. B. Sravnitel’nyj analiz effektivnosti dvuh tekhnik endoskopicheskogo organosohranyayushchego operativnogo lecheniya ektopicheskoj trubnoj beremennosti // Saratovskij nauchno-medicinskij zhurnal. – 2019. – № 15 (1). – Р. 14–18.
5. Cervical pregnancy – a differentiated approach to organpreserving operations / V. N. Sidorenko, E. F. Podrezenko, I. A. Tabakova, N. A. Schneider // Medical Journal. – 2022. – № 1(79). – P. 133–141.
6. Ektopicheskaya beremennost’: sovremennaya koncepciya: ucheb.-metod. posobie / O. A. Peresada [et al.]. – Minsk: BelMAPO, 2020. – 42 s.
7. Lozeau, A. M., Potter B. Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy // Am. Fam. Phys. – 2005. – Vol. 72, № 9. – P. 1707–1714.
8. Jurkovic, D., Memtsa M., Sawyer E., Donaldson A. N. A., Jamil A., Schramm K., Sana Y., Otify M., Farahani L., Nunes N., Ambler G., Ross J. A. Single-dose systemic methotrexate vs expectant management for treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a placebo-controlled randomized trial // Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. – Vol. 49, Issue 2. – P. 171–176.
9. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine et al.
10. Auger, N., Ayoub A., Wei S. Q. Letrozole: future alternative to methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy? – 2020.
11. Dr Femke Mol, PhD Norah M van Mello, Ph. D. Annika Strandell, PhD Karin Strandell, MD Davor Jurkovic, MD Jackie Ross, MD et al. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. – 2014. – Vol. 383 (9927). – P. 483–1489.
Review
For citations:
Sidorenko V.N., Kartasheva E.B., Kovaleva Zh.I., Gudkov A.V., Bugrov V.Yu., Gordievich A.V. Differential approach in the surgical treatment of tube pregnancy. Medical Journal. 2022;(4):102-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2022.4.102